Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roboinvest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:18, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Roboinvest

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. This startup existed for less than 24 months before it was merged into a small company in Idaho that, itself, doesn't have a WP article. Until it shuttered, its coverage, though through RS, was limited to routine launch announcements made within 60 days of its founding. DarjeelingTea (talk) 22:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:CORPSPAM. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 23:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- A7 material and corporate spam. No indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A WP:SPA article on a short-lived start-up. I am not seeing anything beyond the usual start-up coverage and routine coverage of its later merger. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 14:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence of notability and thus fails WP:NCORP. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 14:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.